The Court agrees that proof of employing Ms. Wolschlager is pertinent into the problem of the defendants’ animus toward obese individuals.

The Court agrees that proof of employing Ms. Wolschlager is pertinent into the problem of the defendants’ animus toward obese individuals.

II. Docket No. 31

A. Proof that the plaintiff ended up being changed by Shannon Wolschlager

The defendants state the plaintiff was changed by Christine MacKenzie, maybe not *872 Ms. Wolschlager, together with defendants argue that the plaintiff must not have the ability to provide proof otherwise. Based on the proof presented regarding the summary judgment movement, evidently Ms. Wolschlager had the plaintiffs task amongst the plaintiff and Ms. MacKenzie. Nonetheless, in the time the plaintiff surely could get back to work, Ms. MacKenzie was at the positioning. Ms. Wolschlager is slim, and Ms. MacKenzie is obese. The defendants state it could be misleading into the jury to argue that Ms. Wolschlager replaced the plaintiff. The plaintiff counters that Ms. Continue reading →